W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

Re: A very short list of residual datatyping issues (just one ;-)

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 13 Mar 2002 10:06:09 +0200
To: ext Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@mimesweeper.com>
CC: ext Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B8B4D511.1098B%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
On 2002-03-12 20:48, "ext Graham Klyne" <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
wrote:

> At 01:03 PM 3/12/02 +0200, Patrick Stickler wrote:
>> works OK, since the bNode is a member of the value
>> space of xsd:integer; but
>> 
>>    Bob age "35" .
>> 
>> generates a range constraint conflict since "35" is
>> a member of the lexical space, not value space of
>> xsd:integer.
> 
> This is addressed/allowed by the latest datatyping proposal [1], in the form:
> 
>   ex:Jenny ex:age "10" .
>   ex:age rdfs:drange datatype:decimal .

You missed my point, Graham. I was concerned with generic application
of rdfs:range constraints by RDFS Validators having no special knowledge
of datatypes.

Obviously, I'm quite aware of the functionality of rdfs:drange.

Patrick


> #g
> --
> 
> [1] http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/users/phayes/simpledatatype23-02-2002.html
> 
> 
> -------------------
> Graham Klyne
> <GK@NineByNine.org>
> 
> 

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 13 March 2002 03:04:08 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:46:17 EDT