W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ]

From: Martin Duerst <duerst@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 08 Mar 2002 10:59:00 +0900
Message-Id: <>
To: "Jeremy Carroll" <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>, <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>
At 11:02 02/03/07 +0000, Jeremy Carroll wrote:
>I clearly had misunderstood somewhat, thanks for the full response.
> > Yes indeed, we would have to agree that
> >     "10,03"-fi equal? "10.03"-en
> > is out of scope, but not because the I18N WG/IG requires all
> > XML documents to use XML Schema formatted datatypes only, but
> > because any spec that would want to define the above equivalences
> > for a significant number of languages and datatypes in an
> > interoperable and user-acceptable way might take years or more.
>Personally, I think this leaves Pat's examples as in scope (eventually),
>rather than out-of-scope.

Jeremy, I think that the I18N IG has missed the the original
examples. Could you repost them for us or send us a pointer?

Regards,    Martin.
Received on Thursday, 7 March 2002 23:37:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:56 UTC