W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > March 2002

RE: xml:lang [was Re: Outstanding Issues ]

From: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
Date: Thu, 7 Mar 2002 11:02:06 -0000
To: <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>, <w3c-i18n-ig@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JAEBJCLMIFLKLOJGMELDGEDMCDAA.jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
I clearly had misunderstood somewhat, thanks for the full response.

> Yes indeed, we would have to agree that
>     "10,03"-fi equal? "10.03"-en
> is out of scope, but not because the I18N WG/IG requires all
> XML documents to use XML Schema formatted datatypes only, but
> because any spec that would want to define the above equivalences
> for a significant number of languages and datatypes in an
> interoperable and user-acceptable way might take years or more.

Personally, I think this leaves Pat's examples as in scope (eventually),
rather than out-of-scope.

Received on Thursday, 7 March 2002 06:13:16 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:56 UTC