W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2002

Re: Making progress

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 03:36:49 -0400 (EDT)
To: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
cc: "ext R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0206260336380.11389-100000@tux.w3.org> 

On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Patrick Stickler wrote:

>
> On 2002-06-25 19:06, "ext R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com> wrote:
>
> > If darkness is specified by the addition of something to the graph, then
> > there is no way to avoid non-mon. We have been over this many times now.
> > Could we please stop reopening this issue?
> >
> > ...
> >
> > Darkness specification has to be *in the language*, not in a particular
> > file using the language.
>
> Would you say that the approach of using reification to express
> unasserted triples is "in the language" and thus avoids
> non-monotonicity?

No.

Dan
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2002 03:36:53 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:49:23 EDT