W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2002

Re: Making progress

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 11:01:31 +0300
To: ext Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
CC: "ext R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B93F4F8B.17682%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>

On 2002-06-26 10:36, "ext Dan Brickley" <danbri@w3.org> wrote:

> On Wed, 26 Jun 2002, Patrick Stickler wrote:
> 
>> 
>> On 2002-06-25 19:06, "ext R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com> wrote:
>> 
>>> If darkness is specified by the addition of something to the graph, then
>>> there is no way to avoid non-mon. We have been over this many times now.
>>> Could we please stop reopening this issue?
>>> 
>>> ...
>>> 
>>> Darkness specification has to be *in the language*, not in a particular
>>> file using the language.
>> 
>> Would you say that the approach of using reification to express
>> unasserted triples is "in the language" and thus avoids
>> non-monotonicity?
> 
> No.

Why is it not in the language?

Why is it non-monotonic?

Patrick 

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2002 03:57:03 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:49:23 EDT