W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2002

Re: Making progress

From: Patrick Stickler <patrick.stickler@nokia.com>
Date: Wed, 26 Jun 2002 10:20:36 +0300
To: "ext R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com>, RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <B93F45F4.17665%patrick.stickler@nokia.com>

On 2002-06-25 19:06, "ext R.V.Guha" <guha@guha.com> wrote:

> If darkness is specified by the addition of something to the graph, then
> there is no way to avoid non-mon. We have been over this many times now.
> Could we please stop reopening this issue?
> 
> ... 
>
> Darkness specification has to be *in the language*, not in a particular
> file using the language.

Would you say that the approach of using reification to express
unasserted triples is "in the language" and thus avoids
non-monotonicity?

Patrick

--
               
Patrick Stickler              Phone: +358 50 483 9453
Senior Research Scientist     Fax:   +358 7180 35409
Nokia Research Center         Email: patrick.stickler@nokia.com
Received on Wednesday, 26 June 2002 03:16:06 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:49:23 EDT