Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary

[...]

> >I remain unconvinced of the utility, let alone necessity,
> >of unasserted triples in any form.
>
> Then you should take that issue up in Webont, since the Webont WG has
> specifically requested us to provide a dark-triples mechanism of some
> kind.

I'm convinced that if we assert a triple then
we should assert all its 'near' triples as well
e.g. all top level triples in a graph.
I haven't found any harm in doing so
even at the proof tree level.

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/