W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > June 2002

Re: the idea of a 'reserved' vocabulary

From: Jos De_Roo <jos.deroo.jd@belgium.agfa.com>
Date: Sat, 15 Jun 2002 16:27:17 +0200
To: patrick hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Message-ID: <OF4C4F5F7E.5CA0FBF4-ONC1256BD9.004E5C10@agfa.be>



[...]

> >I remain unconvinced of the utility, let alone necessity,
> >of unasserted triples in any form.
>
> Then you should take that issue up in Webont, since the Webont WG has
> specifically requested us to provide a dark-triples mechanism of some
> kind.

I'm convinced that if we assert a triple then
we should assert all its 'near' triples as well
e.g. all top level triples in a graph.
I haven't found any harm in doing so
even at the proof tree level.

-- ,
Jos De Roo, AGFA http://www.agfa.com/w3c/jdroo/
Received on Saturday, 15 June 2002 10:27:59 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:49:18 EDT