Re: datatypes input

At 10:57 AM 7/18/02 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:
> > >That can be handled without resorting to untidy literals.
> > >
> > >I did some test cases to show that a while ago...
> > >   http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/test/datatypeAtoB.n3
> >
> > If I interpret that properly, then you need two properties, say <age> and
> > <ageL>.  My understanding is that WG agrees that this works, but that
> > having two properties is unacceptable.
>
>Jeremy was quite explicit in the Feb ftf that there could be
>two properties, as I recall.

I think that Jeremy was explicit that it was OK to satisfy that particular 
entailment with two properties.  Separately, the WG decided not to require 
two distinct properties.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>

Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 19:07:08 UTC