- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: 18 Jul 2002 10:57:22 -0500
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
On Thu, 2002-07-18 at 10:41, Brian McBride wrote: > At 10:18 18/07/2002 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: > > [...] > > >Is the Cannes entailment the thing that was called Jeremy's entailment > >in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/#d-2002-02-26-3 ? > > Yes. Jeremy was bashful so we renamed it. > > > >That can be handled without resorting to untidy literals. > > > >I did some test cases to show that a while ago... > > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/test/datatypeAtoB.n3 > > If I interpret that properly, then you need two properties, say <age> and > <ageL>. My understanding is that WG agrees that this works, but that > having two properties is unacceptable. Jeremy was quite explicit in the Feb ftf that there could be two properties, as I recall. > If we agreed that two properties > was acceptable, then I think all this would just go away. The argument is > that there will be lots of user error and confusion resulting from having > to distinguish between the two cases. > > >I guess I don't have time to keep up. Sorry. > > I do wish you could. Sigh. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Thursday, 18 July 2002 11:57:57 UTC