At 10:18 18/07/2002 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote: [...] >Is the Cannes entailment the thing that was called Jeremy's entailment >in http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20020225-f2f/#d-2002-02-26-3 ? Yes. Jeremy was bashful so we renamed it. >That can be handled without resorting to untidy literals. > >I did some test cases to show that a while ago... > http://www.w3.org/2000/10/swap/test/datatypeAtoB.n3 If I interpret that properly, then you need two properties, say <age> and <ageL>. My understanding is that WG agrees that this works, but that having two properties is unacceptable. If we agreed that two properties was acceptable, then I think all this would just go away. The argument is that there will be lots of user error and confusion resulting from having to distinguish between the two cases. >I guess I don't have time to keep up. Sorry. I do wish you could. BrianReceived on Thursday, 18 July 2002 11:43:06 UTC
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:58 UTC