Re: rdfms-syntax-incomplete

At 10:08 18/07/2002 -0500, Dan Connolly wrote:

>preface: I remain opposed to re-opening this issue,
>on the grounds that we've slipped considerably
>since our "last call in May" target, and this
>represents more stuff between us and last call.

This chairs position was to not reopen the issue at this time, but to 
indicate that if a slam dunk proposal was submitted to the WG, then I would 
not be opposed, provided it did not delay us.

Brian