- From: <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Thu, 10 Jan 2002 19:12:25 GMT
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Time:
10:00:00 Fri Jan 11 2002 in America/New York
which is equivalent to
15:00:00 Fri Jan 11 2002 in Europe/London
Phone: +1-617-761-6200 (Zakim)#7332
irc: irc.openprojects.net #rdfcore
1: Allocate scribe
2: Roll Call
3: Review Agenda
4: Next telecon - 10am Boston time, 18 Jan 2002
5: Review Minutes of 2001-12-14
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Dec/0108.html
6: Confirm Status of Completed Actions
ACTION: 2001-11-30#6 Mike Dean
Sumamrise Joint Committee position, confirm with them, circulate to us.
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0033.html
ACTION: 2001-12-07#1a Jos
review new syntax wd
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Dec/0095.html
ACTION: 2001-12-07#2b Jeremy
Review new syntax wd
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Dec/0115.html
ACTION: 2001-12-07#2c Patrick
Review syntax WD
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Dec/0096.html
ACTION: 2001-12-07#3a Jos
Review test case on para 196
see:
http://cvs.ilrt.org/cvsweb/redland/rdfcore/rdfms-para196
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Dec/0098.html
ACTION: 2001-12-07#3b jeremy
review test case for para 196
see:
http://cvs.ilrt.org/cvsweb/redland/rdfcore/rdfms-para196
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Dec/01
ACTION: 2001-12-14#1 Pat Hayes
Copy current editors draft to www-archive@w3.org and tell WebOnt WG of its existence.
ACTION: 2001-12-14#5 Dave Beckett
Get syntax WD revision to be published to Eric
ACTION: 2001-12-14#6 Eric Miller
Act as team contact for publication (of syntax WD)
ACTION: 2001-12-14#7 Jeremy Carroll
look at #rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr
see:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0018.html
7: Syntax WD
Congratulations to DaveB on publishing another WD
8: Status of Test Cases WD
ACTION: 2001-11-30#3 Jan Grant Get access to test case areas of W3C site
Is this document upto date? Do we have test cases for all decisions?
Where are we on entailment tests?
9: Status of Primer
10: Model Theory WD
Actions:
2001-12-14#2 Jos De Roo Review Model Theory WD
2001-12-14#2 Jeremy Carroll Review Model Theory WD
2001-12-14#2 Patrick Stickler Review Model Theory WD
This will be a reminder to folks to complete there review.
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-archive/2002Jan/att-0007/01-RDF_Model_Theory.htm
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0000.html
11: Review test cases on para 196
2001-11-30#5 Dave Beckett Create test case showing that the 2nd URL in Para 196 is permitted.
2001-12-07#3a Jos Review test case on para 196
2001-12-07#3b jeremy review test case for para 196
See:
http://cvs.ilrt.org/cvsweb/redland/rdfcore/rdfms-para196
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Dec/0098.htm
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Dec/01
12: Issue: #rdfms-qname-uri-mapping
The WG resolves to not change the algorithm for mapping qnames to uris
and close this issue on the grounds:
1. Such a change would be a major change to the mapping of
RDF/XML syntax to the model and would be beyond our charter.
2. It would cause the same RDF/XML to generate a different
graph from existing versus revised implementations
3. Existing code may generate wrong (illegal) graphs for some RDF/XML.
See:
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-qname-uri-mapping
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0016.html
13: Issue: #rdfms-reification-required
The WG resolves that a parser is not required to create bags of reified
statements for all rdf:Description elements, only those which are
explicitly reified using an rdf:ID on a propertyElt or by an RDF:bagID
on the rdf:Description.
Existing test cases, such as:
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-ns-prefix-confusion/test0001.rdf
demonstrate this resolution.
See:
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-reification-required
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0017.html
14: Issue: #rdfms-replace-value
Proposal 1 (DaveB): The WG resolves:
to not change the name rdf:value and close this issue on the grounds:
1. Insufficient reasons to make this change
2. Will causing an existing uses to be illegal - such as as
the examples in M&S.
Proposal 2 (Aaron): Open a new issue to clarify the semantics of rdf:value.
Aaron has proposed text for this issue.
Proposal 3 (bwm): The proposed name change was intended to better express
the meaning of the property. However the meaning of the property is not clear.
The WG therefore:
o resolves to not change the name of this property at this time on
the grounds:
- insufficient reasons to make this change
- will casue existing uses to be illegal - such as examples in m&s
o resolves to recast this issue as a need to clarify the semantics
of rdf:value.
o actions bwm to update issues list with text based on Aarons proposal
o actions DB to remove this issue from the list affecting the syntax
See:
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-replace-value
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0015.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0025.html
15: Datatypes
2001-11-30#6 MikeD Sumarise Joint Committee position, confirm with them, circulate to us.
Status? Plans?
See:
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Dec/0065.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0033.html
16: Issue: #rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr
Discuss Jeremy and Jan's proposals.
See:
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-not-id-and-resource-attr
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0018.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2002Jan/0034.html
17: Issue: rdfms-assertion
Discuss current status
See:
http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdfms-assertion
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0568.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-rdf-comments/2001OctDec/0324.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0560.html
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0558.html
------------------------------------------------------------
This agenda was produced by Jema, the Jena WG assistant
Received on Thursday, 10 January 2002 14:12:50 UTC