Re: Pls Review: New Media Type Draft

On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> > ...is rendered very weak by the 'might'. The media type doesn't allow
> > us
> > to infer such intent, so why are we mentioning it?
> >
> > I can't think of any better wording (sorry) so propose we drop that
> > parag.
>
> This is the wording we agreed to on the telecon today, even though it's
> hilariously weak. Should we change the resolution too?

I thought we agreed to it staying re the W3C doc, not re the IETF one... I
still don't like it, but retracted my objection on basis of 'can fix later'. I'd
rather fix it in one place than two...

Dan