W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2002

Re: Pls Review: New Media Type Draft

From: Dan Brickley <danbri@w3.org>
Date: Fri, 23 Aug 2002 19:26:15 -0400 (EDT)
To: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>
cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
Message-ID: <Pine.LNX.4.30.0208231924280.30722-100000@tux.w3.org>

On Fri, 23 Aug 2002, Aaron Swartz wrote:

> > ...is rendered very weak by the 'might'. The media type doesn't allow
> > us
> > to infer such intent, so why are we mentioning it?
> >
> > I can't think of any better wording (sorry) so propose we drop that
> > parag.
> This is the wording we agreed to on the telecon today, even though it's
> hilariously weak. Should we change the resolution too?

I thought we agreed to it staying re the W3C doc, not re the IETF one... I
still don't like it, but retracted my objection on basis of 'can fix later'. I'd
rather fix it in one place than two...

Received on Friday, 23 August 2002 19:26:15 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 14:53:59 UTC