Re: Pls Review: New Media Type Draft

On Friday, August 23, 2002, at 11:42  AM, Dan Brickley wrote:
> typo: s/denals/denials/ (shows I read it :)

I copied this from the ninebynine spec. Graham, please fix this in your 
copy too.

> [[
> RDF/XML documents with this media type might be published with the 
> intent
> of being such an assertional representation (as distinguished from 
> other
> XML or text that may just happen to look like RDF assertions).
> ]]
>
> ...is rendered very weak by the 'might'. The media type doesn't allow 
> us
> to infer such intent, so why are we mentioning it?
>
> I can't think of any better wording (sorry) so propose we drop that 
> parag.

This is the wording we agreed to on the telecon today, even though it's 
hilariously weak. Should we change the resolution too?

-- 
Aaron Swartz [http://www.aaronsw.com] I am large, I contain multitudes.