W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Dark triples, motivating examples

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 12:51:24 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020416124917.00a58850@joy.songbird.com>
To: Aaron Swartz <aswartz@swartzfam.com>
Cc: RDF Core <w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org>
At 12:11 AM 4/16/02 -0500, Aaron Swartz wrote:
> > PS. A pre-emptive strike: reification doesn't do it, either.
>
>Alright, but do dark triples fix reification?

I think not, because they don't of themselves provide a way to identify a 
statement.  Of course, one can use the reification vocabulary and 
assert(sic) that it's "dark", but I guess that's not what you meant by "fix"?

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2002 08:35:36 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:29 EDT