First off, thanks for your very helpful explanation of the problem. On 2002-04-15 08:07 PM, "Pat Hayes" <phayes@ai.uwf.edu> wrote: > Peter has shown that [not having dark triples] can actually produce > inconsistencies in the OWL, basically rendering what would otherwise be > perfectly good OWL assertions into nonsense. Can you provide a pointer to this finding? > PS. A pre-emptive strike: reification doesn't do it, either. Alright, but do dark triples fix reification? -- [ "Aaron Swartz" ; <mailto:me@aaronsw.com> ; <http://www.aaronsw.com/> ]Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2002 01:20:04 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:28 EDT