W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > April 2002

Re: Dark triples, motivating examples

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Tue, 16 Apr 2002 12:31:52 +0100
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20020416123028.00a7fc80@joy.songbird.com>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 09:07 PM 4/15/02 -0400, Pat Hayes wrote:
>... I would also suggest the easiest way to go would be to provide some 
>way to say that a given namespace is 'dark'; Peter and I agree that, while 
>somewhat less flexible than allowing an arbitrary distinction, this would 
>be sufficient to allow WOWG to proceed.

I think this is problematic:  in an RDF (abstract) graph, there's no 
certain way to know the namespace (URI) to which any given URIref belongs.

#g


-------------------
Graham Klyne
<GK@NineByNine.org>
Received on Tuesday, 16 April 2002 08:35:31 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:47:29 EDT