- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Fri, 19 Oct 2001 10:21:07 -0500
- To: Jeremy Carroll <jjc@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org, timbl@w3.org
Jeremy Carroll wrote: [...] > While that isn't perfect, I believe xml:lang is used by RDF users and there > is no critical problem with it. Would you please elaborate on that? i.e. please give an example (or several examples) of how RDF users use xml:lang, and what software they use to process it according to their expecatations? All of my attempts to deal with xml:lang have run into critical problems. For example, I tried to do a visualization of the RDF schema for RDF, using cwm, and I couldn't find a way to get it to filter the french labels from the english labels... because the xml:lang information isn't in triple form. I'm starting to think this is worth changing the charter over: if the xml:lang stuff is to be significant, it must be in triple form. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Friday, 19 October 2001 11:22:11 UTC