Folks, Just so folks are clear about what proposals S, P and X refer to: The naming was first suggested by Jeremy in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0131.html I added X. Proposal P is the Hayes/Patel-Schneider proposal, loosely characterized as: a "literal" node in a graph is labelled by a literal string, e.g. "10" such a node may be the subject of an rdf:type property with value, e.g. xsd:decimal to define its type. Such labelling may be implied by an a range constraint in an rdf schema. Proposal S was proposed by Sergey in http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Oct/0530.html It can be loosely characterized as: typed values, such as the integer 10, are represented in the graph by a bNode. The bNode will have one or more properties defining lexical representations of the integer, e.g. _:int <xsd:decimal> "10" . Proposal X is the X-values idea from Patrick referred to in: http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-rdfcore-wg/2001Nov/0039.html which be loosely characterized as define a URI scheme for typed values e.g. dt:xsd:decimal:10. BrianReceived on Thursday, 8 November 2001 07:06:55 EST
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:42:34 EDT