W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2001

Re: Proposed issue resolutions (#rdf-equivalent-uris)

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Wed, 07 Nov 2001 09:24:55 -0600
Message-ID: <3BE95247.2D5C450@w3.org>
To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
CC: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
Brian McBride wrote:
> 
> Pat Hayes wrote:
> 
> >> I'm being thick again.  Can someone explain how this works for
> >> resources which are neither properties nor classes.
> >
> >
> > It doesn't, relax. I have this annoying habit of reacting to emails when
> > I read them, which sometimes misses things that have been said since.
> 
> No problem.  However to take note of Aaron's point, propose instead:
> 
> Propose postpone
> 
>    http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-equivalent-uris
> 
> on the grounds that the issue of defining an equivalence mechanism for arbritary
> URI's is out of scope of the WG's current charter.  The WG notes however, that
> by allowing cycles in rdfs:subPropertyOf and rdfs:subClassOf RDF Schema provides
> a related mechanism for properties and classes.

seconded, on the condition that a primer editor takes an action
to include this in a primer.

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Wednesday, 7 November 2001 10:25:45 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:42:33 EDT