W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > November 2001

Re: Proposed issue resolutions

From: Graham Klyne <Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
Date: Tue, 06 Nov 2001 20:19:04 +0000
Message-Id: <5.1.0.14.2.20011106201614.037f7ca0@joy.songbird.com>
To: Pat Hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
Cc: Aaron Swartz <me@aaronsw.com>, w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
At 12:32 PM 11/6/01 -0600, Pat Hayes wrote:
>>On Monday, November 5, 2001, at 12:12  PM, Brian McBride wrote:
>>
>>>   http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-equivalent-uris
>>>
>>>on the grounds that it is out of scope of the charter.
>>
>>Umm, it was my understanding that subPropertyOf allowed one to define two 
>>resources as equivalent by doing:
>>
>>foo rdfs:subPropertyOf bar .
>>bar rdfs:subPropertyOf foo .
>>
>>Is this not true?
>
>Well caught, Aaron.

Would it not be true to say that the above construct indicates that the two 
property resources have the same relational extension, rather than that 
they are the same resource?  (Or is that what you mean by "equivalent"?)

Ditto rdfs:subClassOf and rdfs:Class?

#g


------------------------------------------------------------
Graham Klyne                    MIMEsweeper Group
Strategic Research              <http://www.mimesweeper.com>
<Graham.Klyne@MIMEsweeper.com>
------------------------------------------------------------
Received on Tuesday, 6 November 2001 15:53:14 EST

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:42:31 EDT