- From: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- Date: Mon, 23 Jul 2001 22:38:45 -0700
- To: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Cc: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
>Graham Klyne wrote: >[...] > > So where does this leave the original discussion? I think we still have > > every anonymous resource being something whose existence is asserted. > >Winding back the stack, (is the data still there?) you objected to the >use case on the grounds that it represented a query template and was thus >not sanctioned by M&S. > >I think we've got to the point where this is a legitimate use case. Yes? I don't think so. At the least, we should put this up as an explicit item for discussion: do we have a clear notion of query, and how does it relate to the notion of an assertion? (What does it mean to satisfy a query, can queries generate other queries, can queries be incorporated into an RDf graph (how?), can one query a literal, and so on.) Pat --------------------------------------------------------------------- (650)859 6569 w (650)494 3973 h (until September) phayes@ai.uwf.edu http://www.coginst.uwf.edu/~phayes
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2001 01:38:38 UTC