- From: Brian McBride <bwm@hplb.hpl.hp.com>
- Date: Tue, 24 Jul 2001 11:00:42 +0100
- To: pat hayes <phayes@ai.uwf.edu>
- CC: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
pat hayes wrote: > > >Graham Klyne wrote: > >[...] > > > So where does this leave the original discussion? I think we still have > > > every anonymous resource being something whose existence is asserted. > > > >Winding back the stack, (is the data still there?) you objected to the > >use case on the grounds that it represented a query template and was thus > >not sanctioned by M&S. > > > >I think we've got to the point where this is a legitimate use case. Yes? > > I don't think so. At the least, we should put this up as an explicit > item for discussion: do we have a clear notion of query, and how does > it relate to the notion of an assertion? Query? What query? This use case contains only assertions. There is a description of a service that will buy roses. There is a description of a service that will sell roses. We may assume that there is a service that can do useful things with these assertions. But I see no query here. Brian
Received on Tuesday, 24 July 2001 06:03:18 UTC