- From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
- Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:13:30 -0500
- To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
test005 sure looks squirrelly too... <rdf:li> gets special treatment when it's a typednode? Ugh... that was evidently on purpose... rdf:li elements will be translated to rdf:_nnn elements when they are found matching either a propertyElt (production 6.12) or a a typedNode (production 6.13). -- http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity I guess my implementation will raise a "not supported" exception in that case; I don't see sufficient value to implement this. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2001 23:13:33 UTC