test005 sure looks squirrelly too... <rdf:li> gets special treatment when it's a typednode? Ugh... that was evidently on purpose... rdf:li elements will be translated to rdf:_nnn elements when they are found matching either a propertyElt (production 6.12) or a a typedNode (production 6.13). -- http://www.w3.org/2000/03/rdf-tracking/#rdf-containers-syntax-ambiguity I guess my implementation will raise a "not supported" exception in that case; I don't see sufficient value to implement this. -- Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2001 23:13:33 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:47 EDT