W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org > August 2001

containers test0004 baffles me

From: Dan Connolly <connolly@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 21 Aug 2001 22:08:01 -0500
Message-ID: <3B832211.82C0C378@w3.org>
To: w3c-rdfcore-wg@w3.org
I'm adding container support to an RDF parser tonight...
it sure is nice to have a pile of test cases to work
with.

But this one looks totally bogus. Did we really
endorse this one? If so, would somebody show me the record?

http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.rdf
http://www.w3.org/2000/10/rdf-tests/rdfcore/rdf-containers-syntax-vs-schema/test004.nt

why aren't e1 and e4 treated the same way?

Also... this test involves reification; did
we consciously decide how reification works here?

-- 
Dan Connolly, W3C http://www.w3.org/People/Connolly/
Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2001 23:08:04 EDT

This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:47 EDT