On Tue, 21 Aug 2001, Brian McBride wrote: > > > Jan Grant wrote: > > > > > The action point text says "Write up a fix/workaround for folks > > using the currently defined semantics for domain and range constraints." > > > > Alas, I can't do that; what I _said_ at the meeting was that the other > > "missing" bits of RDFS would give us this for free; I'll elabourate this > > below. > > Hmmm. I transcribed the action based on the notes at: > > http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20010801-f2f/2001-08-02.html#T19-07-14 > > and I note that the scribe at the time was using the nick 'jan' :) > > Please can you propose some alternative wording for the action and > I'll update the minutes. The message that started this thread actually referred to the AP at http://www.w3.org/2001/sw/RDFCore/20010801-f2f/2001-08-02.html#T19-16-18 (which I don't think made the minutes...?) -- jan grant, ILRT, University of Bristol. http://www.ilrt.bris.ac.uk/ Tel +44(0)117 9287088 Fax +44 (0)117 9287112 RFC822 jan.grant@bris.ac.uk Lambda calculus? I hardly know 'er!Received on Tuesday, 21 August 2001 12:00:53 EDT
This archive was generated by hypermail pre-2.1.9 : Wednesday, 3 September 2003 09:38:47 EDT