W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2002

Re: broken URL in the

From: Tom Gindin <tgindin@us.ibm.com>
Date: Wed, 3 Apr 2002 01:20:31 -0500
To: reagle@w3.org
Cc: Merlin Hughes <merlin@baltimore.ie>, w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Message-ID: <OFB12FB9FA.EEEE2CBC-ON85256B90.0022BB4F@pok.ibm.com>

      Actually, example.org is better for examples than the US Post Office
(usps.gov) .

            Tom Gindin

Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>@w3.org on 04/02/2002 04:57:15 PM

Please respond to reagle@w3.org

Sent by:    w3c-ietf-xmldsig-request@w3.org


To:    Merlin Hughes <merlin@baltimore.ie>
cc:    w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org
Subject:    Re: broken URL in the



Merlin, thank you for the new examples but I had a couple of questions.

I'm confused as to whether your update [1] is supposed to replace
merlin-fifteen and merlin-sixteen in the interop matrix? (I think for new
implementors, it's easier to download a working tar ball than one with some

broken versions and updates.)

Also, Don said he'd tried to restore xmldsig.pothole but I don't think he
has, and I'm still willing to provide a necessary URI.

As an aside, unless the post office has a address namespace, it's probably
best to start the URI with example.org.

Also, I wasn't sure what you were trying to do with [2], but I don't think
it worked since the attachement didn't get a new URI?

Finally, one of your examples uses
"http://www.w3.org/2000/09/xmldsig#Reference" and that identifier does not
exist (there's no definition, if we need such an identifier we should
create one instead of abusing the 09/xmldsig namespace.)

[1]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2002JanMar/0263.html
[2]
http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-ietf-xmldsig/2002JanMar/0263.html
Received on Wednesday, 3 April 2002 01:21:13 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:15 GMT