W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: My latest try on Exclusive XML Canonicalization

From: Joseph Reagle <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Mon, 29 Oct 2001 17:19:35 -0500
To: <hirsch@zolera.com>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>
Message-Id: <20011029221935.05D9D8777C@policy.w3.org>
[
  http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xml-exc-c14n
  $Revision: 1.7 $ on $Date: 2001/10/29 22:18:32 $ GMT by $Author: reagle $
]

Ok I beleive I've fixed the schema definition, and I also updated the 
section and references links.

On Monday 29 October 2001 13:56, Frederick Hirsch wrote:
> A minor question on the Schema definition, should it be
>
> <complexType name="InclusiveNamespacePrefixType">
>   <attribute name="List" type="NMTOKENS"/>
> </complexType>
>
> where the spelling of complexType has changed, the name includes Type as
> part of the name and the attribute attribute is an empty element.
>
> In section 3 on the implementation method, I found step 2 slightly
> confusing (If node is not in the subset then recurse). I think it means,
> if the node is not in the subset, process the children of the node
> recursively, regardless.

-- 

* I will be in France from 3-9 November for the W3C AC Meeting.

Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature/
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Monday, 29 October 2001 17:19:37 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:14 GMT