Re: AW: X509CRL discord

It is still the case that there is no provision for a PKCS#7 binary
structure in the standard, although there is in the additional URIs
draft.  So only a minor change is needed. "certificates or a CRL"
should be replaced by "certificates and CRLs".

Thanks,
Donald

From:  "Joseph M. Reagle Jr." <reagle@w3.org>
Message-Id:  <4.3.2.7.2.20010515144407.00b849e8@localhost>
X-Sender:  reagle@localhost
Date:  Tue, 15 May 2001 14:44:51 -0400
To:  "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Cc:  "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>,
            "merlin" <merlin@baltimore.ie>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>,
            <lde008@dma.isg.mot.com>
In-Reply-To:  <200105151308.JAA0000006788@torque.pothole.com>
References:  <Your message of "Tue, 15 May 2001 10:54:29 +0200." <LBEPJAONIMDADHFHAEAOMEKKCFAA.gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>

>At 09:08 5/15/2001 -0400, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote:
>>Great! Unless some opposition crops up soon, there is clearly a
>>consensus to make this change.
>
>I've updated the editor's copy and schema, and tweaked the natural language, 
>my only question is should the following text be tweaked as well:
>
>http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html#sec-X509Data
>>Note, there is no direct provision for a PKCS#7 encoded "bag" of 
>>certificates or CRLs. However, a set of certificates or a CRL can occur 
>>within an X509Data element and multiple X509Data elements can occur in a 
>>KeyInfo.
>
>__
>Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
>W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
>IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
>W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/

Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2001 15:03:03 UTC