W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org > April to June 2001

Re: AW: X509CRL discord

From: Joseph M. Reagle Jr. <reagle@w3.org>
Date: Tue, 15 May 2001 14:44:51 -0400
Message-Id: <4.3.2.7.2.20010515144407.00b849e8@localhost>
To: "Donald E. Eastlake 3rd" <dee3@torque.pothole.com>
Cc: "Gregor Karlinger" <gregor.karlinger@iaik.at>, "merlin" <merlin@baltimore.ie>, <w3c-ietf-xmldsig@w3.org>, <lde008@dma.isg.mot.com>
At 09:08 5/15/2001 -0400, Donald E. Eastlake 3rd wrote:
>Great! Unless some opposition crops up soon, there is clearly a
>consensus to make this change.

I've updated the editor's copy and schema, and tweaked the natural language, 
my only question is should the following text be tweaked as well:

http://www.w3.org/Signature/Drafts/xmldsig-core/Overview.html#sec-X509Data
>Note, there is no direct provision for a PKCS#7 encoded "bag" of 
>certificates or CRLs. However, a set of certificates or a CRL can occur 
>within an X509Data element and multiple X509Data elements can occur in a 
>KeyInfo.


__
Joseph Reagle Jr.                 http://www.w3.org/People/Reagle/
W3C Policy Analyst                mailto:reagle@w3.org
IETF/W3C XML-Signature Co-Chair   http://www.w3.org/Signature
W3C XML Encryption Chair          http://www.w3.org/Encryption/2001/
Received on Tuesday, 15 May 2001 14:50:36 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0 + w3c-0.29 : Thursday, 13 January 2005 12:10:13 GMT