W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: (Opposite of working-copy?) Comment on draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 02 Dec 2009 17:58:56 +0100
Message-ID: <4B169CD0.2020401@gmx.de>
To: Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@mac.com>
CC: Atom-syntax Syntax' <atom-syntax@imc.org>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, Al Brown <albertcbrown@us.ibm.com>
Jan Algermissen wrote:
> Julian,
> 
> what is your opinion regarding the introduction of a link relation that 
> is the opposite of working-copy in order to being able to find the 
> versioned resource that the working copy I have is a working copy of?
> 
> I am undecided regarding the necessity, but without a working-copy-of 
> relation it seems the client would need to maintain that information 
> (the relationship or the fact that a given resource is a working copy) 
> across requests.
> 
> I do not think this is really I-D publication relevant right now, please 
> understand it only as a side comment.
> ...

I have no problems adding this; the reason it hasn't been proposed was 
that apparently CMIS didn't have a use case for it.

Al, any opinion on this from a CMIS point of view?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Wednesday, 2 December 2009 16:59:43 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Wednesday, 2 December 2009 16:59:43 GMT