W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2009

Re: Comments on Action:draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-03

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Thu, 26 Nov 2009 17:30:59 +0100
Message-ID: <4B0EAD43.1050304@gmx.de>
To: Jan Algermissen <algermissen1971@mac.com>
CC: Atom-syntax Syntax' <atom-syntax@imc.org>, WebDAV <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Jan Algermissen wrote:
> 
> On Nov 26, 2009, at 2:29 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
>>
>> "When a resource is put under version control, it becomes a "versioned 
>> resource". Many servers protect versioned resources from modifications 
>> by considering them "checked in", and by requiring a "checkout" 
>> operation before modification, and a "checkin" operation to go back to 
>> the "checked-in" state. Other servers allow modification, in which 
>> case the checkout/checkin operation may happen implicitly."
>>
> 
>> When a resource is put under version control, it becomes a "versioned 
>> resource". Many servers protect versioned resources from modifications 
>> by considering them "checked in", and by requiring a "checkout" 
>> operation before modification, and a "checkin" operation to go back to 
>> the "checked-in" state. Other servers allow modification and perfrom 
>> versioning without requiring an explicit checkout operation.
> 
> 
> I feel there should be the notion of 'modification of checked-out 
> working copy' in there but I don't mean to say that your above wording 
> isn't suitable also.
> ...

For now I have applied my change proposal in 
<http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-brown-versioning-link-relations-latest.html#rfc.section.2>, 
but that doesn't mean we can't spend some more time with wordsmithing :-)

BR, Julian
Received on Thursday, 26 November 2009 16:31:42 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Thursday, 26 November 2009 16:31:42 GMT