Re: REBIND a parent to a child

Geoffrey M Clemm schrieb:
> 
> My response was incomplete.  In case the server does support binding 
> loops, but /a was the only binding to the collection, so the REBIND 
> effectively deletes the collection, then the server would fail the 
> request with DAV:new-binding in the DAV:error status response message 
> (since the collection does not contain the new binding, since it has 
> been deleted).
> 
> Cheers,
> Geoff

Well. But if there's another binding to b, such as /c, all is fine, 
right? "/a" would be gone, but would be accessible as "/c/a".

Best regards, Julian