W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: RFC2518bis - tracking the things we agree on...

From: Cullen Jennings <fluffy@cisco.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Sep 2005 10:10:22 -0700
To: WebDav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <BF5D798E.52284%fluffy@cisco.com>


Lisa, can you weigh in on how you want to track the issues that we have
clear consensus on. If you want to use both
>> <http://www.webdav.org/wg/rfcdev/issues.htm> and
>> <http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=WebDAV-RFC2518-bi
I can cope with that, thought it seems like having one would be better than
two.



On 8/23/05 1:52 PM, "Elias Sinderson" <elias@cse.ucsc.edu> wrote:

> 
> Julian Reschke wrote:
> 
>> [...] So can we please consider the union of
>> <http://www.webdav.org/wg/rfcdev/issues.htm> and
>> <http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=WebDAV-RFC2518-bi
>> s> 
>> as current issues list?
> 
> I would think this to be a reasonable starting point for the upcoming
> efforts.
> 
> Re: Bugzilla, are we intending to continue tracking issues on the
> bugzilla installation? I would be in favor of this for a number of
> reasons that I'll skip over here. (I'll happily enumerate them if asked,
> but one should think they them to be rather self-evident and well
> understood.) Assuming all are in favor of this approach, someone will
> need to take on the task of importing the issues listed on the
> webdav.org site into bugzilla. . .
> 
> For historical and other reasons it would be desireable to import all of
> the issues listed, although a certain amount of pragmatism would dictate
> that closed issues could be safely omitted. At the very least, an email
> should be sent to the mailing list with a summary of the already closed
> issues as detailed within the webdav.org list.
> 
> Following the import into bugzilla, it would seem straightforward to go
> through them one-by-one in seperate threads.
> 
> 
> Cheers,
> Elias
Received on Monday, 26 September 2005 17:10:38 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:09 GMT