W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > July to September 2005

Re: RFC2518bis (process)

From: Elias Sinderson <elias@cse.ucsc.edu>
Date: Tue, 23 Aug 2005 13:52:10 -0700
Message-ID: <430B8C7A.1000709@cse.ucsc.edu>
To: WebDav <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Julian Reschke wrote:

> [...] So can we please consider the union of 
> <http://www.webdav.org/wg/rfcdev/issues.htm> and 
> <http://ietf.cse.ucsc.edu:8080/bugzilla/buglist.cgi?product=WebDAV-RFC2518-bis> 
> as current issues list? 

I would think this to be a reasonable starting point for the upcoming 

Re: Bugzilla, are we intending to continue tracking issues on the 
bugzilla installation? I would be in favor of this for a number of 
reasons that I'll skip over here. (I'll happily enumerate them if asked, 
but one should think they them to be rather self-evident and well 
understood.) Assuming all are in favor of this approach, someone will 
need to take on the task of importing the issues listed on the 
webdav.org site into bugzilla. . .

For historical and other reasons it would be desireable to import all of 
the issues listed, although a certain amount of pragmatism would dictate 
that closed issues could be safely omitted. At the very least, an email 
should be sent to the mailing list with a summary of the already closed 
issues as detailed within the webdav.org list.

Following the import into bugzilla, it would seem straightforward to go 
through them one-by-one in seperate threads.

Received on Tuesday, 23 August 2005 20:52:24 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:32 UTC