I certainly agree with that. Cheers, Geoff Julian wrote on 01/19/2005 07:24:54 PM: > > Geoffrey M Clemm wrote: > > > > I agree with Roy's rationale and conclusion, and support the > > removal of the reference to live properties in section 2.6. > > Just checking...: > > for a server that does support both RFC3253 and BIND, the value of a > WebDAV property MUST NOT vary across bindings unless it's reported as a > live property through DAV:supported-live-property-set? > > (That's something we all should be able to agree upon)Received on Thursday, 20 January 2005 02:10:45 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:07 GMT