Re: ETags?

Geoffrey M Clemm wrote:
> 
> I agree with Roy's rationale and conclusion, and support the
> removal of the reference to live properties in section 2.6.

Just checking...:

for a server that does support both RFC3253 and BIND, the value of a 
WebDAV property MUST NOT vary across bindings unless it's reported as a 
live property through DAV:supported-live-property-set?

(That's something we all should be able to agree upon)

Best regards, Julian

-- 
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

Received on Thursday, 20 January 2005 00:25:35 UTC