W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2005

REDIRECT, was: WG process (was Re: I-D ACTION:draft-ietf-webdav-quota-07.txt)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 27 May 2005 14:22:07 +0200
Message-ID: <429710EF.6020106@gmx.de>
To: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@osafoundation.org>
CC: 'webdav' WG <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>

Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> ...
>>> we don't have the energy as a WG to finish that properly, it's my  
>>> opinion that we could instead bring  BIND immediately to submission  
>>> as an Informative RFC, where it would be an exemplary and  
>>> high-quality example of that class.
>>
>>
>> That would indeed be preferrable to doing nothing at all (although,  
>> shouldn't it be "Experimental" instead???); however I personally 
>> think  that the BIND spec really should be submitted for publication 
>> as  "Proposed" (in contrast to REDIRECT which *currently* seems to 
>> only  have one implementation).
> 
> 
> Sorry; you're right, Experimental would probably be better.  REDIRECT  
> could also go to experimental immediately.

I'd prefer it to go to "Proposed" (that seems in line with the Standards 
Process). Anyway, if you feel it's done, why don't you start a WG last 
call for it?

Best regards, Julian
Received on Friday, 27 May 2005 12:22:14 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:08 GMT