W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2004

WebDav

From: Basavaraj <basavaraj.prabha@jpmil.com>
Date: Thu, 24 Jun 2004 14:36:28 +0530
Message-ID: <020a01c459ca$89c3c170$960510ac@ns.jpsil.com>
To: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@osafoundation.org>
Cc: <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>

Hi ,
I am Working with WebDav.
I got Struck in Access Tables Fields Through XML
Can you let me know how to access it dynamically.
As of now i have had coded (Sample code Pasted below in color)and making it
work for particular User Only.
Now i want to Dynamically Access Fields from a Table for any user.
        ExUser *userInfo = new ExUser();
        userInfo->Domain = "JPM";// Domain Name
        userInfo->Login = "ikon5"; // User
        userInfo->mailboxId = "ikon5";// Alias to User
        userInfo->mailServer = "JPSERV5";//Exchange Server
        userInfo->Password = "ikon5"; //Password
It would be pleasure if answed.
Thanks in Advance.
-Basavaraj Prabha

----- Original Message ----- 
From: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@osafoundation.org>
To: "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Cc: <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>; "Geoffrey M Clemm" <geoffrey.clemm@us.ibm.com>
Sent: Thursday, June 24, 2004 2:32 AM
Subject: Re: Issue 2.5_language, was: ID: draft-ietf-webdav-bind-05


>
> Well, I certainly read it wrong although I read it carefully, because I
> forgot that REBIND is defined differently than MOVE so that the
> Request-URI is the target collection.  And it's not obvious to me that
> the source collection doesn't need to implement REBIND for this to
> work.  But if everybody else who reads the spec is clear on this, then
> I'll write it off as an anomaly.
>
> Lisa
>
> On Jun 23, 2004, at 1:43 PM, Julian Reschke wrote:
>
> > Lisa Dusseault wrote:
> >
> >> Because the sentence talked only about one collection supporting
> >> REBIND, and I would think that the most important collection to
> >> support REBIND in this case would be the source collection.  I think
> >> that was a reasonable and careful read of the text.
> >
> > Well, no:
> >
> > "If the destination collection of a MOVE request supports the REBIND
> > method (see Section 6), a MOVE of a resource into that collection MAY
> > be implemented as a REBIND request."
> >
> > The text clearly talks about the destination collection, and as far as
> > I can tell, it's doing that on purpose.
> >
> >> Perhaps my assumption would not have held up if the sentence had said
> >> "if the destination collection and the source resource of a MOVE
> >> request both support the REBIND method ..." etc.
> >
> > The source resource doesn't need to support REBIND - REBIND is a
> > method where the Request-URI is the target collection into which the
> > new binding is added.
> >
> > Best regards, Julian
> >
> > -- 
> > <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>
Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 05:07:00 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT