Geoffrey M Clemm wrote: > > This precondition sounds fine to me. > > I wouldn't say it applies to all methods though; only methods that > modify state on the server (e.g., not PROPFIND or the various > REPORT's). Right now it starts saying... "If a request would modify the content for a locked resource, a dead property of a locked resource, a live property that is defined to be lockable for a locked resource, or an internal member URI of a locked collection,", thus it *does* apply to all methods. An alternative would be to re-group the conditions; but that would only make case if we find more that fall into the same category... Best regards, Julian -- <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760Received on Thursday, 24 June 2004 02:58:37 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT