W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2004

Re (2): summary of BIND/RFC2518 status

From: <edgar@edgarschwarz.de>
Date: Sun, 2 May 2004 22:31:00 +0200 (MEST)
Message-Id: <200405022031.i42KV0xu003855@post.webmailer.de>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
Cc: edgar@edgarschwarz.de

Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de> wrote:
> Geoff and I have volunteered to author a standalone WebDAV Locking 
> specification
Thanks, please do it.

> Unless people can think of new arguments, I'd propose that the WG simply 
> votes on the issue. To restate our proposal:
> 1) We will *not* add locking discussion to BIND (in fact, we may want to 
> remove some locking-specific preconditions).
> 2) We'll extract all parts relevant to Locking from RFC2518, integrate 
> GULP and resolve all locking related issues from the RF2518 issues list, 
>   and publish this as a separate LOCKING document (starting as Proposed 
> standard updating RFC2518).
> 3) As a consequence, the authors of RFC2518bis should remove the locking 
> part of the specification (once both RFC2518bis becomes a Draft standard 
> and LOCKING is a Proposed standard, it will be relatively simple to 
> advance LOCKING as well).
> 4) draft-ietf-webdav-bind-05 as published can be wg-last-called after 
> possibly referencing the LOCKING spec.
+ 1

Cheers, Edgar
Received on Sunday, 2 May 2004 16:31:18 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:06 GMT