W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > January to March 2003

Re: Move and Delete (was: bind draft issues)

From: Brian Korver <briank@xythos.com>
Date: Fri, 7 Mar 2003 12:14:57 -0800
To: "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-Id: <778524F0-50D9-11D7-8A8F-000393751598@xythos.com>

On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 10:07  AM, Clemm, Geoff wrote:
> My reading of the consensus of the working group (although certainly
> not universal agreement) is that atomic behavior
> on the part of the server is preferable when the server is capable of
> doing so, especially when multiple bindings to a resource is possible.
> But since some servers cannot guarantee atomic behavior, this
> was made a "SHOULD" instead of a "MUST".  Similarly, any server 
> implementors
> that feel their clients want non-atomic behavior can present non-atomic
> behavior and still be compatible with the spec (because it is a SHOULD,
> not a MUST).
>
> In addition, I believe there was consensus that allowing the
> client to explicitly request atomic behavior was desireable, and this
> is achieved through the introduction of UNBIND/REBIND.
>
> Cheers,
> Geoff

Geoff,

My reading of the consensus was that the atomic behavior should
be a "MAY", not a "SHOULD" as you suggest, but I don't have religion
on the issue.

-brian
briank@xythos.com
Received on Friday, 7 March 2003 15:14:59 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:03 GMT