On Friday, March 7, 2003, at 10:07 AM, Clemm, Geoff wrote: > My reading of the consensus of the working group (although certainly > not universal agreement) is that atomic behavior > on the part of the server is preferable when the server is capable of > doing so, especially when multiple bindings to a resource is possible. > But since some servers cannot guarantee atomic behavior, this > was made a "SHOULD" instead of a "MUST". Similarly, any server > implementors > that feel their clients want non-atomic behavior can present non-atomic > behavior and still be compatible with the spec (because it is a SHOULD, > not a MUST). > > In addition, I believe there was consensus that allowing the > client to explicitly request atomic behavior was desireable, and this > is achieved through the introduction of UNBIND/REBIND. > > Cheers, > Geoff Geoff, My reading of the consensus was that the atomic behavior should be a "MAY", not a "SHOULD" as you suggest, but I don't have religion on the issue. -brian briank@xythos.comReceived on Friday, 7 March 2003 15:14:59 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:03 GMT