W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: BIND spec and PROPFIND Depth: infinity question(s)

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 08:22:07 +0200
To: "Chris Knight" <Christopher.D.Knight@nasa.gov>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCOEPDHKAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>


yes, both should appear.

Can you explain why you think that it needs to be stated more explicitly?


<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760 

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Chris Knight
> Sent: Friday, June 27, 2003 1:39 AM
> To: w3c-dist-auth@w3.org
> Subject: BIND spec and PROPFIND Depth: infinity question(s)
> I would like some clarification (that should probably make it into the 
> BIND spec.)
> If I have a binding from /a/b to g and from /a/b/c to g and I do an 
> infinite PROPFIND, starting at /a/b, should I get results with both 
> "/a/b/g" and "/a/b/c/g" (two URIs for the same resource)? I'm assuming 
> so (and, hence, the resourceid property would enable me to determine 
> that these are the same resource.)
> If you haven't guessed, I'm actively trying to develop a server capable 
> of handling the BIND spec. (And, perhaps, the changes I make may end up 
> in Catacomb, as reality permits.)
Received on Friday, 27 June 2003 02:22:11 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:27 UTC