W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: Reminder: WG Last Call on Ordered Collections

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 17:05:32 +0200
To: "WebDAV" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCOEJGHCAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

OK,

now that the WG last call period has ended, let's decide how to proceed.

There was one open issue, for which there was one vote for change (Lisa),
and one vote for no change (Geoff). As acting editor I lean to no-change. If
this is ok for everybody, I'll submit the draft located at


http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protocol-latest.
html

as version 08.

Julian

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Julian Reschke
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 10:23 PM
> To: Jim Whitehead; WebDAV
> Subject: RE: Reminder: WG Last Call on Ordered Collections
>
>
>
> Thans Jim,
>
> the current edits are this URL:
>
>
> http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protoc
> ol-latest.
> html
>
> There's currently one unresolved issue for which I am looking for
> feedback:
>
>
> http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protoc
> ol-latest.
> html#rfc.issue.6.1-when-are-members-added
>
> In case that there's no additional feedback, the plan is to close
> it as "no
> change".
>
> Regards,
>
> Julian
>
> --
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>
Received on Monday, 28 April 2003 11:05:39 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:04 GMT