W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > April to June 2003

RE: Reminder: WG Last Call on Ordered Collections

From: Lisa Dusseault <lisa@xythos.com>
Date: Mon, 28 Apr 2003 12:05:57 -0700
To: "'Julian Reschke'" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <024c01c30db9$3781f340$f8cb90c6@xythoslap>

"No change" isn't acceptable when the comment is that something is not
specified.  My last issue was "if a destination is not being
overwritten, then shouldn't the MOVE (the rename) preserve ordering?"

The spec can say "When a resource is moved within a collection and the
destination did not previously exist (the 'rename' case), its relative
ordering MUST be preserved." Or the spec could say SHOULD or MAY.
However, staying silent on an issue like this allows some implementors
to assume MUST and others to assume MAY.

That said, if a sentence like this is added to the draft we do not need
to go through WG last call again for this issue.

Lisa

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org 
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org] On Behalf Of Julian Reschke
> Sent: Monday, April 28, 2003 8:06 AM
> To: WebDAV
> Subject: RE: Reminder: WG Last Call on Ordered Collections
> 
> 
> 
> OK,
> 
> now that the WG last call period has ended, let's decide how 
> to proceed.
> 
> There was one open issue, for which there was one vote for 
> change (Lisa),
> and one vote for no change (Geoff). As acting editor I lean 
> to no-change. If
> this is ok for everybody, I'll submit the draft located at
> 
> 
http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protocol-lat
est.
html

as version 08.

Julian

--
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Julian Reschke
> Sent: Tuesday, April 22, 2003 10:23 PM
> To: Jim Whitehead; WebDAV
> Subject: RE: Reminder: WG Last Call on Ordered Collections
>
>
>
> Thans Jim,
>
> the current edits are this URL:
>
>
> http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protoc
> ol-latest.
> html
>
> There's currently one unresolved issue for which I am looking for
> feedback:
>
>
> http://greenbytes.de/tech/webdav/draft-ietf-webdav-ordering-protoc
> ol-latest.
> html#rfc.issue.6.1-when-are-members-added
>
> In case that there's no additional feedback, the plan is to close
> it as "no
> change".
>
> Regards,
>
> Julian
>
> --
> <green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
>
Received on Monday, 28 April 2003 15:06:08 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:04 GMT