W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: WG Agendas for the 55th IETF

From: Clemm, Geoff <gclemm@rational.com>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 09:30:15 -0500
Message-ID: <E4F2D33B98DF7E4880884B9F0E6FDEE2EB090A@SUS-MA1IT01>
To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
My point was that I have no particular opinion on
which way to go for the XML 1.1 and XML namespace issues
that you raised (and in your email that raised
the issues, you indicated that you didn't have a
proposed resolution either).  So although I'd be
happy to participate in a discussion on this topic,
I wouldn't be able to "drive" it in any particular


-----Original Message-----
From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 7:36 AM
To: Clemm, Geoff; w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
Subject: RE: WG Agendas for the 55th IETF

> From: Clemm, Geoff

> I would raise the XML namespace issues, though, until we have some
> proposal as to how to address them (I agree they are issues, but
> like Julian, I have no proposal for how to address them).

I think there's some misunderstanding here.

The namespace issue as defined in Jason's list ([1]),
DAV_WITH_COLON_IS_NOT_A_URI, is closed (we don't need to change anything).

The XML 1.1 and XML namespaces 1.1 *potential* issues should be at least
considered ([2]).


[1] <http://www.webdav.org/wg/rfcdev/issues.htm>
[2] <http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/w3c-dist-auth/2002OctDec/0148.html>
<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 8 November 2002 09:30:47 UTC

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.3.1 : Wednesday, 7 January 2015 15:01:26 UTC