W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2002

RE: WG Agendas for the 55th IETF

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Fri, 8 Nov 2002 15:35:26 +0100
To: "Clemm, Geoff" <gclemm@rational.com>, <w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCEEBEFMAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>

> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On
> Behalf Of Clemm, Geoff
> Sent: Friday, November 08, 2002 3:30 PM
> To: w3c-dist-auth@w3c.org
> Subject: RE: WG Agendas for the 55th IETF
> My point was that I have no particular opinion on
> which way to go for the XML 1.1 and XML namespace issues
> that you raised (and in your email that raised
> the issues, you indicated that you didn't have a
> proposed resolution either).  So although I'd be
> happy to participate in a discussion on this topic,
> I wouldn't be able to "drive" it in any particular
> direction.

I see.

At this point, we should just note that there are potential issues. After
all, both specs (XML 1.1 and namespaces 1.1) aren't finished yet.

<green/>bytes GmbH -- http://www.greenbytes.de -- tel:+492512807760
Received on Friday, 8 November 2002 09:35:58 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:44:02 GMT