W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2001

Re: RFC2518 (WebDAV) / RFC2396 (URI) inconsistency

From: Roy T. Fielding <fielding@ebuilt.com>
Date: Mon, 26 Nov 2001 15:27:33 -0800
To: Mark Baker <distobj@acm.org>
Cc: Larry Masinter <LMM@acm.org>, "'Martin Duerst'" <duerst@w3.org>, "'Stefan Eissing'" <stefan.eissing@greenbytes.de>, "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>, uri@w3.org
Message-ID: <20011126152733.B8631@waka.ebuilt.net>

> Interesting.  Just to clarify, what are you suggesting be changed?
> That "foo:" be a valid absolute URI reference, or a valid relative
> one?

An absolute URI -- otherwise, the parsers would have to be changed.

....Roy

Received on Monday, 26 November 2001 18:31:17 GMT

This message: [ Message body ]
Next message: Jim Whitehead: "RE: RFC2518 (WebDAV) / RFC2396 (URI) inconsistency"
Previous message: Roy T. Fielding: "Re: RFC2518 (WebDAV) / RFC2396 (URI) inconsistency"
In reply to: Mark Baker: "Re: RFC2518 (WebDAV) / RFC2396 (URI) inconsistency"
Next in thread: Mark Baker: "Re: RFC2518 (WebDAV) / RFC2396 (URI) inconsistency"
Reply: Mark Baker: "Re: RFC2518 (WebDAV) / RFC2396 (URI) inconsistency"

Mail actions: [ respond to this message ] [ mail a new topic ]
Contemporary messages sorted: [ by date ] [ by thread ] [ by subject ] [ by author ]
Help: [ How to use the archives ] [ Search in the archives ]

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:59 GMT