Roy, > > but have left out the following possibilities: > > > > * Change the XML namespace spec to allow "scheme-name:" as > > a namespace name, even though it isn't a legal URI > > (This isn't such a big deal, since XML namespace names allow > > IRIs with non-ASCII characters anyway, not really URIs) > > In case anyone is wondering, "scheme:" is not allowed in the URI syntax > because Web browsers and client libraries do interpret it as a form of > relative URI due to a loophole in CERN's original partial URI algorithm. > People never used it, but the loophole makes it impossible for such an > identifier to be interoperable. > > OTOH, I have found at least one other example -- the "about:" URL in > Netscape Navigator -- so I guess this could be changed in a future revision > of 2396. Interesting. Just to clarify, what are you suggesting be changed? That "foo:" be a valid absolute URI reference, or a valid relative one? MB -- Mark Baker, Chief Science Officer, Planetfred, Inc. Ottawa, Ontario, CANADA. mbaker@planetfred.com http://www.markbaker.ca http://www.planetfred.comReceived on Sunday, 25 November 2001 20:30:47 GMT
This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:59 GMT