W3C home > Mailing lists > Public > w3c-dist-auth@w3.org > October to December 2001

RE: content type for WebDAV request/response bodies, was: [ACL] Access Control Protocol -07 submitted

From: Julian Reschke <julian.reschke@gmx.de>
Date: Wed, 21 Nov 2001 20:24:06 +0100
To: "Lisa Dusseault" <lisa@xythos.com>, "Julian Reschke" <julian.reschke@gmx.de>, <mtimmerm@opentext.com>, "'WebDAV'" <w3c-dist-auth@w3.org>
Message-ID: <JIEGINCHMLABHJBIGKBCGEDIDIAA.julian.reschke@gmx.de>
OK,

then it's much easier to use Jim Clark's:

{namespaceUri}name

Julian

> -----Original Message-----
> From: w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org
> [mailto:w3c-dist-auth-request@w3.org]On Behalf Of Lisa Dusseault
> Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:55 AM
> To: Julian Reschke; mtimmerm@opentext.com; 'WebDAV'
> Subject: RE: content type for WebDAV request/response bodies, was: [ACL]
> Access Control Protocol -07 submitted
>
>
> Where I saw this used, it wasn't supposed to be a valid URI.  It was just
> supposed to be a way of representing DAV property names to
> systems that only
> supported name/value pairs, rather than namespace/name/value tuples.
>
> lisa
>
> > -----Original Message-----
> > From: Julian Reschke [mailto:julian.reschke@gmx.de]
> > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 10:41 AM
> > To: Lisa Dusseault; Julian Reschke; mtimmerm@opentext.com; 'WebDAV'
> > Subject: RE: content type for WebDAV request/response bodies, was: [ACL]
> > Access Control Protocol -07 submitted
> >
> >
> > > From: Lisa Dusseault [mailto:lisa@xythos.com]
> > > Sent: Wednesday, November 21, 2001 7:35 AM
> > > To: Julian Reschke; mtimmerm@opentext.com; 'WebDAV'
> > > Subject: RE: content type for WebDAV request/response bodies,
> was: [ACL]
> > > Access Control Protocol -07 submitted
> > >
> > > ..
> > >
> > > You ask how to map <foo xmlns="http://a.b.c/d#e"/>: since it
> > ends in 'e',
> > > add a '#', and it becomes "http://a.b.c/d#e#foo".  When going
> > back to real
> > > XML form, scan backward from the end for the last '#', remove it.
> >
> > But "http://a.b.c/d#e#foo" isn't a valid URI (reference), right?
>
Received on Wednesday, 21 November 2001 14:24:40 GMT

This archive was generated by hypermail 2.2.0+W3C-0.50 : Tuesday, 2 June 2009 18:43:59 GMT